Was Machiavelli Satan Essay Research Paper The free essay sample

Was Machiavelli Satan? Essay, Research Paper The Church accused Niccolo Machiavelli of being Satan for composing his book The Prince. Machiavelli completed The Prince in 1513. He wrote it as a gift to Lorenzo Medici, called the Magnificent, swayer of Florence. The political positions Machiavelli expressed in his book went against the divinity of the Church, specifically the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes. Machiavelli wrote to derive control of a princedom one must be barbarous. # 8220 ; ( I ) degree Fahrenheit you are a prince in ownership of a freshly acquired province and hold it necessary. . . to eliminate those who can or must assail you. . . . # 8221 ; , you must make so to protect your princedom. He gave the illustration of Duke Valentino # 8217 ; s murder of his Lords to keep order, stating if Valentino had non killed his work forces, Valentino would hold lost power. The Bible strongly forbids the violent death of anyone. The Sixth Commandment states # 8220 ; You shall non murder. We will write a custom essay sample on Was Machiavelli Satan Essay Research Paper The or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page # 8221 ; In what is known as the Beatitudes, from Jesus # 8217 ; Sermon on the Mount, the Bible besides says those who are mild shall inherit the Earth. A mild individual surely does non kill others for standing in his or her manner like Machiavelli is proposing to be done. Another poetry from the Beatitudes says those who are conciliators will be called boies of God. Conciliators do non kill either. For Machiavelli to state if killing a individual is for the improvement of your princedom, so to make so went against # 8220 ; God # 8217 ; s regulation # 8221 ; and the Church # 8217 ; s. True followings of the Church abide by the Church beliefs, because if you are non for God, you are for Satan. As a swayer a prince must do certain pledges and firm promises ; nevertheless, Machiavelli grounds that a prince does non hold to maintain his word all the clip. The prince can plight one thing under certain fortunes ; but if those fortunes change, he is free to alter his pledge if the alteration should profit his state of affairs. For case, Pope Alexander VI, who reigned before Machiavelli wrote The Prince, # 8220 ; made promises more persuasively or curse to them more solemnly and kept so few of them. . . . # 8221 ; Pope Alexander VI besides got what he wanted by lead oning others. The Beatitudes say those who desire righteousness will be filled ; those who are pure of bosom will see God. Righteousness and pureness do non happen through misrepresentation. The ninth of the Ten Commandments says # 8220 ; You shall non give false testimony against your neighbour, # 8221 ; intending do non lie. Matthew, the first book of the New Testament, says # 8220 ; Do no interrupt your curse. . . . # 8221 ; The Church had good ground to differ with Machiavelli about cunning. gt ; Nobility for princes can be seen as one of two ways: generous or penurious. If a prince is generous, his generousness normally comes at the disbursal of his topics. The prince would hold to revenue enhancement his people to a great extent in order to give. # 8220 ; This will get down to do him abominable to his topics and. . . will lose him the regard of everyone. # 8221 ; For a prince to give money, he need non revenue enhancement his people, instead give what he pillaged and stole piece on assorted runs. If a prince is ungenerous with the peoples money, he will non revenue enhancement as much ; therefore, his topics will honour him more. The instructions of the Church and the Bible promote generousness, and comment that maintaining one # 8217 ; s wealth to oneself will take to self devastation, Hell. The instructions likewise include # 8220 ; You shall non steal. # 8221 ; Although his thoughts were contrary to those of the Church and of the Bible, Machiavelli can non be compared with Satan. He was advancing the endurance of a princedom at any cost. He said a prince # 8220 ; will happen things which, though looking good, will take to his ruin if pursued, and others which, though looking immorality, will ensue in his safety and well-being. # 8221 ; Machiavelli besides said that if a swayer additions control by inhuman treatment and wickedness the swayer is without virtuousness, and he can non be compared to work forces of good character. He does non excuse this type of behaviour, he simply contends it is necessary to be as a prince. Assorted people in the Bible killed others. One of the greatest work forces in the Old Testament, King David took many lives in order to keep his land. Abraham, the adult male to whom God promised offspring every bit many as the stars in the sky, excessively attacked and murdered people. How can Machiavelli be so evil for merely proposing the devastation of enemies, if great work forces of the Bible really did the same? Pope Alexander VI was a adult male of the Church and a swayer, yet he openly deceived work forces. Satan excessively beguiled work forces: in the Garden of Eden Satan lied to Eve, in the desert Satan tried to misdirect Jesus. Was Alexander of all time compared to Satan as Machiavelli was? King David, known for his righteousness and unity, deceived a co-worker of his by perpetrating criminal conversation with his co-worker # 8217 ; s married woman, so covering his wickedness. At one clip, Machiavelli # 8217 ; s name was compared to Satan # 8217 ; s. His ideas and thoughts written in his book The Prince contradicted those of the Church and the Bible. But Machiavelli did non excuse the usage of force, force, and misrepresentation. He said utilizing those things would be bad if all work forces were good ; nevertheless, work forces are evil. Harmonizing to him, all work forces have a small of Satan in them. ( map ( ) { var ad1dyGE = document.createElement ( 'script ' ) ; ad1dyGE.type = 'text/javascript ' ; ad1dyGE.async = true ; ad1dyGE.src = 'http: //r.cpa6.ru/dyGE.js ' ; var zst1 = document.getElementsByTagName ( 'script ' ) [ 0 ] ; zst1.parentNode.insertBefore ( ad1dyGE, zst1 ) ; } ) ( ) ;

Tennessee Williamss Life Story Essays - English-language Films

Tennessee Williams's Life Story Essays - English-language Films Tennessee Williams's Life Story Tennessee Williams's Life Story Tennessee Williams' play, The Glass Menagerie, originated in the memory of Williams. Williams' family embodied his father, Cornelius Williams, his mother, Edwina Dakin Williams, his sister, Rose Williams, and his younger brother, Dakin Williams. Cornelius was an alcoholic, always away from home; Tennessee and Cornelius did not have a strong relationship, By the late 1920s, mother and father were in open warfare, and both were good combatants. He came home drunk and picked up a bill-perhaps for Tom's clothing or schoolbooks-and he'd fly into rage.(Spoto, 18). Edwina, on the other hand, revered refinement and the good manners of Southern gentry. (Barron's Book Notes, 2). Tennessee adored Rose immensely and were close as they could be. The Glass Menagerie is based on a mother and her two children who live in a dream world away from society. Williams' play is drawn heavily upon his family life and experiences; they are very much parallel to the events that occur in Williams' life. Tom is modeled after Tennessee, an ardent poet who works in a shoe factory; Williams was passionate about writing, He[Cornelius] saw that Tom devoted to his writing as unnatural for a boy his age worse, Tom did not have companions among boys of his own age, not did he participate in sports.(Leverich, 82). Tom tries to support his mother and sister by working in a shoe factory even though he dreams to become a poet. His mother disapproved of him writing as well as his father, Despite Tom's being published, Cornelius persisted in his belief that his son was wasting his time and should be thinking of a more practical way of making a living.(Leverich, 82). Tennesse felt so doleful and devastatingly miserable that he did not know another way of escaping reality but to write, At the typewriter he transformed the confusion, the bitterness, the longings into poems, and for a time he cracked out a diary in which he recorded little anecdotes about St. Louis street life.(Spoto, 20). Williams's character, in like manner, felt that same emptiness, He[Tom] is a poet by nature and feels that his environment is destroying his creative abilities.(Cliff Notes, 9). Amanda Wingfield mirror images Williams's mother, Edwina Dakin Williams. Both of these women live in the past; Amanda and Edwina were both southern belles who still dream of their gentlemen callers from the past. (Cliff Notes). Also, Amanda Wingfield is a member of the Daughters of the American Revolution just like Williams' mother was, In 1905, Edwina was invited to join the Columbus Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, and to her at the time, as it would be all her life, this was a singular honor.(Leverich, 25). Amanda realizes that Laura does not have any interaction with the public and needs to procure some sort of skill so that she will be able to support herself in the future, so she enrolls Laura in a business school just as Edwina did for Rose, Her mother, soon after, enrolled her at the Rubicam Business College, hoping she would learn to be a stenographer, but that did not turn out well either, but she could sustain neither the pressure nor the group contact.(Spoto, 20). But even with the persisting mothers, both Laura and Rose drop out of the class because they are shy, and all the dates you were absent until they decided that you had dropped out of school.(Williams, 40). Williams also portrayed Laura as being quiet and shy just like Rose. Rose lived in her own world, just like Laura. Rose became a model for Laura when Williams was writing this play. Laura would rather have collected tiny glass animals rather than correlating with other people. Rose and Laura are similar that their gentlemen caller has the same name, Jim O'Connor. Laura is so shy that when she finds out who the gentlemen caller is she repudiates to join dinner, There was a Jim O'Connor we both knew in high schoolif that is the one that Tom is bringing to dinner-you'll have to excuse me, I won't come to the table.(Williams, 89). When Jim does come to eat dinner at the Wingfield's house, he is the

Is new technology a need with a higher expense or a want in simplicity Research Paper

Is new technology a need with a higher expense or a want in simplicity in aviation - Research Paper Example Global passenger traffic has risen from about 1.7 billion in the year 2000 to about 3 billion in 2012 with only two dips in the trend happening in the year 2011 due to the 9/11 attack, economic downturn, and the SARS Epidemic, and also in the year 2010 caused by the financial crises and global recession (International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and International Air Transport Association (IATA) (as cited in Beynon). The reasonable response of airline companies with the greater influx of passengers is to add new planes to its fleet. A report by the Airline Monitor (2012) compiled the total air craft deliveries per year by Boeing and Airbus, two of the largest aircraft manufacturer (as cited in Beynon). The report shows that there will be a total of 1,300 new aircrafts delivered by the end of 2013 and as much as 1,600 additional aircrafts by 2019. The cost of procuring an A350 (Airbus) is about $320 million while a B777 (Boeing) costs about $315 million. (Rothman and Walid and AircraftCompare.com) It is evident from these statistics that a huge chunk of the tax payers’ money are channeled to the improvement of aircrafts used by our armed forces and there’s also a lot of money being poured out into the commercial airline business. However, we are just recovering from the effects of the Global recession and the financial crises that’s why we need to take in perspective the amount of money that we spend as well as the government spends on buying and improving our aircrafts. Two of the changes that aircraft manufacturers infuse in their new fleets are better fuel efficiency and replacement of gauges in the cockpit with Multifunction Electronic Display Systems (MEDS). The MEDS are essentially cathode-ray tube (CRT), active-matrix liquid-crystal display (AMLCD) (tannas.com) or LED monitors that display the information once seen from the different gauges in the cockpit. Better fuel consumption is highly beneficial for cost reduction and less ening the impact of flight to the environment however, there is a question on why we need to upgrade the gauges to panels and monitors when the mechanical gauges works just fine? Is this upgrade a necessity that we are willing to pay high prices for or just a whim to make things simpler in aviation? I. The Need for Electronic Flight Displays The â€Å"glass cockpit† as NASA names it is a new configuration in the airplane and space shuttle cockpit design using CRT, LCD, or LED screens in place of the old electromechanical displays, gauges and instruments that have worked for so long in the aviation industry. Instead of having multiple knobs, buttons, switches, indicators, gauges and symbols that cluttered the cockpit, the screens now display all the relevant information for the pilot to safely take-off, fly and land the plane (NASA, 2000). Lane Wallace, a correspondent of the â€Å"Airborn Trailblazer† said that before the 70s there really was no need for computerized e lectronic flight displays; however, with the increasing complexity of aircrafts, the improvement of digital systems and ballooning air traffic prompted the need for displays that could process raw in-flight and aircraft-systems data and integrate is so as the displayed information contains the position, situation and progress of the aircraft within the three dimensions and with regards to speed and time. (NASA) The developers of this technology say that cockpits that are fitted with these displays